|
|
Post by kilgoretrout on Jun 28, 2010 19:43:57 GMT -5
'Dead people probably cannot breath...' Fact or Theory?
posted at 6/9/2010 7:46 PM EDT on greenvilleonline.com Prod
frednekk
Posts: 618
First: 11/15/2008
Last: 6/27/2010
Poll Results: 8 Total Votes
Dead people probably cannot breath... Well???
2 Votes (25.0%) Yes
5 Votes (62.5%) Possibly
0 Votes (0.0%) No
1 Vote (12.5%) Not sure
You must select one answer before submitting your vote.
View Results...
Dead people probably cannot breath... Well???
Yes
Possibly
No
Not sure
|
|
|
|
Post by CrockHunter on Jun 29, 2010 16:08:23 GMT -5
For the Record.. "He (rowzer.. back when he posted as Tango) told me that it is possible for dead people to breathe BECAUSE the bible did not specifically say that they could not. Sounds a lot like his current "the Constitution DOESN'T say anything pro or con about political parties SOoo they are illegal..doesn't it? ... he repeated the "it's possible for dead people to breathe BECAUSE the bible does not specifically say that they cannot" when he posted as unreconstructed.." Here is his reply to me as Tango from an exchange on the Old Greenville News forum ( I filed it away..it was sooo precious.. ). . . Crock_Hunter Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 277 Location: Reality, USA Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:38 pm Post subject: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The bible says that life is in the breath. “Then the LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.” so unless you think dead people can breathe then life doesn't begin until the first breath..... There are none so blind as those who will not see _________________ ~~~:< CH Back to top Tango Joined: 15 Sep 2006 Posts: 394 Location: Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:42 pm Post subject: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Bible doesn't say that dead people can't breathe. Back to top ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Here is his post as rowzer first admitting that he thinks it's possible for dead people to breathe AND unwittingly admitting that he once posted as the village idiot known as Tango . (read quick before he realizes his faux pas and deletes it.. I have a copy if you need one.. ) rowzerbazzle Posts: 2861 First: 7/2/2009 Last: 6/13/2010 .... The Bible doesn't say that dead people can't breathe. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I log EVERYTHING . . ..... Posted by CrockHunter Yes, I said THAT. tinyurl.com/2dkggbmBTW... I don't lie... He said what he said.. period.. I believe it's probably his best idiotic statement and believe me there are dozens of doozies ... and just like the Carni/rowzer... the whole thing has become a bit of a joke... |
|
|
|
Post by cft on Jul 3, 2010 7:14:31 GMT -5
Dead people can breathe (until you kill 'em with dehydration). Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by kilgoretrout on Jul 3, 2010 10:35:06 GMT -5
Dead people can breathe (until you kill 'em with dehydration). oh but she wasn't dead according to our republicon congress - didn't the quack doctor senator from tennessee confirm her bulb was still lit |
|
|
|
Post by smasher on Jul 3, 2010 13:27:02 GMT -5
Dead people can breathe (until you kill 'em with dehydration). oh but she wasn't dead according to our republicon congress - didn't the quack doctor senator from tennessee confirm her bulb was still lit So then she was murdered? If she was breathing she was alive. |
|
|
|
Post by kilgoretrout on Jul 3, 2010 14:01:03 GMT -5
oh but she wasn't dead according to our republicon congress - didn't the quack doctor senator from tennessee confirm her bulb was still lit So then she was murdered? If she was breathing she was alive. no she was a brain dead piece of meat who was being kept alive by extraordinary means and as per thousands of similar cases, her family wanted to comply with her wishes to prevent this but the cons needed another political slogan |
|
|
|
Post by CrockHunter on Jul 3, 2010 14:28:12 GMT -5
but the cons needed another political slogan Such as . . . . "Death Without Dignity" "You'll Die When We Tell You" "She's Not Dead... That's just how our supporters act" "Schiavo Schmivo... She looks OK to me" ....that's all I've got . . . . . . |
|
|
|
Post by cft on Jul 4, 2010 7:21:20 GMT -5
but the cons needed another political slogan Such as . . . . "Death Without Dignity" "You'll Die When We Tell You" "She's Not Dead... That's just how our supporters act" "Schiavo Schmivo... She looks OK to me" ....that's all I've got . . . . . . On the other side of the spectrum.....
It's okay to starve a human, but if you do this to a dog...
From conception to death, you're just a piece of meat....
Death from dehydration is peaceful, just don't ask me to join along...
|
|
|
|
Post by cft on Jul 4, 2010 7:27:05 GMT -5
So then she was murdered? If she was breathing she was alive. no she was a brain dead piece of meat who was being kept alive by extraordinary means and as per thousands of similar cases, her family wanted to comply with her wishes to prevent this but the cons needed another political slogan Surprisingly, I agree. My main dispute was how they killed her. It was fucking inhumane. The Greenville News nearly came in their pants when the sheriff's office busted up the cock fighting ring last month and all of the animal activists were in the streets with torches and pitchforks over a bunch of chickens, but pull the feeding tube from a goddamn human fucking being?  Oh, she'll just drift off to sleep as organ by organ shuts down. The Schiavo debacle laid bare the selfish intentions of both sides. |
|
|
|
Post by Boatrocker on Jul 4, 2010 9:28:47 GMT -5
Surprisingly, I agree. My main dispute was how they killed her. It was fucking inhumane. The Greenville News nearly came in their pants when the sheriff's office busted up the cock fighting ring last month and all of the animal activists were in the streets with torches and pitchforks over a bunch of chickens, but pull the feeding tube from a goddamn human fucking being? Oh, she'll just drift off to sleep as organ by organ shuts down. The Schiavo debacle laid bare the selfish intentions of both sides. Nothing illustrates our immaturity and hypocrisy like our idiot ability to go along with the notion that treatment considered humane and kind when administered to animals, is just too sick and demented to even consider for humans. |
|
|
|
Post by kilgoretrout on Jul 4, 2010 9:47:45 GMT -5
no she was a brain dead piece of meat who was being kept alive by extraordinary means and as per thousands of similar cases, her family wanted to comply with her wishes to prevent this but the cons needed another political slogan Surprisingly, I agree. My main dispute was how they killed her. It was fucking inhumane. The Greenville News nearly came in their pants when the sheriff's office busted up the cock fighting ring last month and all of the animal activists were in the streets with torches and pitchforks over a bunch of chickens, but pull the feeding tube from a goddamn human fucking being? Oh, she'll just drift off to sleep as organ by organ shuts down. The Schiavo debacle laid bare the selfish intentions of both sides. surprisingly, I agree except for the "selfish intentions laid bare" part more about how in certain situations, comprimise sucks worse than the extremes the left, left to address this issue would choose a more humane approach than cutting off food I suppose the right would continue throwing money at this dead end situation like they do so many others the compromise is palin and simple inhumane |
|
|
|
Post by cft on Jul 4, 2010 10:12:46 GMT -5
Surprisingly, I agree. My main dispute was how they killed her. It was fucking inhumane. The Greenville News nearly came in their pants when the sheriff's office busted up the cock fighting ring last month and all of the animal activists were in the streets with torches and pitchforks over a bunch of chickens, but pull the feeding tube from a goddamn human fucking being? Oh, she'll just drift off to sleep as organ by organ shuts down. The Schiavo debacle laid bare the selfish intentions of both sides. surprisingly, I agree except for the "selfish intentions laid bare" part more about how in certain situations, comprimise sucks worse than the extremes the left, left to address this issue would choose a more humane approach than cutting off food I suppose the right would continue throwing money at this dead end situation like they do so many others the compromise is palin and simple inhumane Nope, both sides demonstrated their own selfishness. The right to lifers jumped on this with both arms and legs just like the end to lifers pounced like cheetah on a crippled gazelle. Caught in the middle were the families being used as a chew toy. We don't seem to have a problem with juicing up Fido with sodium pentobarbital nor do we have a problem starving a human being to death but reverse the patients and you'll end up in 'pound you in the ass' prison. |
|
|
|
Post by kilgoretrout on Jul 4, 2010 10:38:39 GMT -5
gotta disagree
the "end lifers" as you call them have never advocated starvation, except as the only alternative left by the right to lifers. you know that without the right defining it as murder, many on the left would advocate more humane methods to end this sort of pain and suffering.
and the family caught in the middle - I never saw that. from a legal standpoint, all that was left of the family was the husband. the republicons jumps all over his legal right by bringing in other relatives, all for their nonsensical media show
|
|
|
|
Post by CrockHunter on Jul 4, 2010 11:18:54 GMT -5
My main dispute was how they killed her. It was fucking inhumane. That decision was made by the Right... Liberals have consistantly supported having a means of peacefully ending a terminal condition... |
|
|
|
Post by CrockHunter on Jul 4, 2010 11:27:27 GMT -5
Nope, both sides demonstrated their own selfishness. We saw the theatrics played out by the Right..(Frist's podium side diagnosis . . Congress's Palm Sunday Compromise. ... ) . What did I miss from the Left other than "Let this poor woman die in peace" |
|
|
|
Post by kilgoretrout on Jul 4, 2010 13:49:46 GMT -5
Nope, both sides demonstrated their own selfishness. We saw the theatrics played out by the Right..(Frist's podium side diagnosis . . Congress's Palm Sunday Compromise. ... ) . What did I miss from the Left other than "Let this poor woman die in peace" you missed the spin and the refusal of the right to accept responsibility of yet another of their mistakes |
|
|
|
Post by frednekk on Jul 4, 2010 14:26:02 GMT -5
oh but she wasn't dead according to our republicon congress - didn't the quack doctor senator from tennessee confirm her bulb was still lit So then she was murdered? If she was breathing she was alive. Are you saying the unborn are dead? |
|
|
|
Post by frednekk on Jul 4, 2010 14:29:13 GMT -5
just an fyi- I used the results of this 'poll' in a presentation skills class. It was immensely entertaining.
|
|
|
|
Post by kilgoretrout on Jul 4, 2010 14:44:36 GMT -5
just an fyi- I used the results of this 'poll' in a presentation skills class. It was immensely entertaining. I bet nogood voted twice |
|
|
|
Post by CrockHunter on Jul 4, 2010 15:44:25 GMT -5
So then she was murdered? If she was breathing she was alive. Are you saying the unborn are dead? No.. but the bible does say that they are not alive until . . . . “The LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being” |
|
Oh, she'll just drift off to sleep as organ by organ shuts down.
